[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51566ca4-1002-5c62-71d0-9da610bff368@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 13:50:38 +0300
From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>
To: Anurag Kumar Vulisha <anuragku@...inx.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: host: xhci-plat: Iterate over parent nodes for
finding quirks
Hi,
Back from vacation
On 20.07.2018 18:39, Anurag Kumar Vulisha wrote:
>
> Hi Mathias,
>
> Thanks for providing your comments, please find my comments inline
>
>>>
>>> - if (device_property_read_bool(sysdev, "usb2-lpm-disable"))
>>> - xhci->quirks |= XHCI_HW_LPM_DISABLE;
>>> + /* Iterate over all parent nodes for finding quirks */
>>> + for (tmpdev = &pdev->dev; tmpdev; tmpdev = tmpdev->parent) {
>>
>> Isn't sysdev at this point the topmost device that can have any of those device
>> properties set?
>> We could loop from &pdev->dev up to and including sysdev.
>>
>> It doesn't matter much but maybe avoid walking some extra parents.
>>>
> I have seen some drivers ( like dwc3 host.c) which create a child dev, which is
> the pdev that is being passed to xhci_plat_probe(). So, sysdev may not be the
> topmost parent. There could be some properties which may be present in parent
> and may not be populated in the child. So, I made this change to search on all
> available parents for finding a valid property
Ok, lets keep it like you wrote it
>
>>>
>>> - if (device_property_read_bool(sysdev, "usb3-lpm-capable"))
>>> - xhci->quirks |= XHCI_LPM_SUPPORT;
>>> + if (device_property_read_bool(tmpdev, "usb2-lpm-disable"))
>>> + xhci->quirks |= XHCI_HW_LPM_DISABLE;
>>>
>>> - if (device_property_read_bool(&pdev->dev, "quirk-broken-port-ped"))
>>> - xhci->quirks |= XHCI_BROKEN_PORT_PED;
>>> + if (device_property_read_bool(tmpdev, "usb3-lpm-capable"))
>>> + xhci->quirks |= XHCI_LPM_SUPPORT;
>>>
>>> - /* imod_interval is the interrupt moderation value in nanoseconds. */
>>> - xhci->imod_interval = 40000;
>>
>> Setting the default imod_interval could be moved before the for() loop
>>
>
> I thought it would be better if everything related to imod_interval is in one place,
> so kept it as is. I can fix this in v2 if you suggest.
Default imod_interval needs to be set before the for loop to avoid overwriting a value
got from device property
So a v2 is needed
-Mathias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists