lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <570de9f7-eda8-ec72-a4d0-92b4cc2b4fd7@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Date:   Tue, 7 Aug 2018 00:12:01 +0900
From:   Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+bab151e82a4e973fa325@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, dvyukov@...gle.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: WARNING in try_charge

On 2018/08/06 23:58, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> Since I can't find mm related changes between next-20180803 (syzbot can reproduce) and
>> next-20180806 (syzbot has not reproduced), I can't guess what makes this problem go away.
> 
> Hmm, but original report was against 4.18.0-rc6-next-20180725+ kernel.
> And that one had the old group oom code. /me confused.
> 

Yes. But I confirmed that syzbot can reproduce this problem with next-20180803
which already dropped the old group oom code. Therefore, I think that syzbot is
hitting a problem other than the old group oom code.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ