linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] regmap: Add regmap_noinc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 6 Aug 2018 17:04:02 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     "Popa, Stefan Serban" <StefanSerban.Popa@...log.com>
Cc:     "lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "knaack.h@....de" <knaack.h@....de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
        "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mchehab+samsung@...nel.org" <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "pmeerw@...erw.net" <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "leonard.crestez@...el.com" <leonard.crestez@...el.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] regmap: Add regmap_noinc_read API

On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 03:39:53PM +0000, Popa, Stefan Serban wrote:
> On Lu, 2018-08-06 at 15:39 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I suggested having an explicit operation to check if a register supports
> > this mode of operation when I reviewed an earlier version, I didn't
> > notice a reply on that?

> Sorry, I got confused about what needs to be done. Should I add a new field
> to the regmap_config struct which will be checked during the function call?
> Something like can_multi_write? How do you suggest it should be called? Is
> readable_noinc_reg ok?

Like I said last time I'd suggest making it more like the readable and
volatile checks - I'm fairly sure I've seen devices that don't
autoincrement only for some registers.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)