linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d9c9ff93-a183-798a-5404-e1768de7597c@microsoft.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Aug 2018 06:27:13 +0000
From:   Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree

Hi Stephen:
	Thanks for fix. I will discuss with maintainer about how to deal with 
the issue.

On 8/6/2018 1:12 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>    arch/x86/include/asm/trace/hyperv.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>    58ec5e9c9044 ("x86/hyper-v: Trace PV IPI send")
> 
> from the tip tree and commit:
> 
>    47c054685621 ("X86/Hyper-V: Add hyperv_nested_flush_guest_mapping ftrace support")
> 
> from the kvm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>