linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] remoteproc: Introduce custom dump function for each remoteproc segment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Aug 2018 11:45:39 +0530
From:   Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ohad@...ery.com, kyan@...eaurora.org,
        sricharan@...eaurora.org, akdwived@...eaurora.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, tsoni@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] remoteproc: Introduce custom dump function for
 each remoteproc segment

Hi Sibi,

On 27-07-18, 20:49, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Introduce custom dump function per remoteproc segment. It is responsible
> for filling the device memory segment associated with coredump
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h           |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 283b258f5e0f..ec56cd822b26 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1183,13 +1183,18 @@ static void rproc_coredump(struct rproc *rproc)
>  		phdr->p_align = 0;
>  
>  		ptr = rproc_da_to_va(rproc, segment->da, segment->size);
> -		if (!ptr) {
> -			dev_err(&rproc->dev,
> +
> +		if (segment->dump) {
> +			segment->dump(rproc, ptr, segment->size, data + offset);

Am not sure I follow, you are calling this w/o checking if ptr is valid,
so you maybe passing null to segment->dump() ?

> +		} else {
> +			if (!ptr) {
> +				dev_err(&rproc->dev,
>  				"invalid coredump segment (%pad, %zu)\n",
>  				&segment->da, segment->size);
> -			memset(data + offset, 0xff, segment->size);
> -		} else {
> -			memcpy(data + offset, ptr, segment->size);
> +				memset(data + offset, 0xff, segment->size);
> +			} else {
> +				memcpy(data + offset, ptr, segment->size);
> +			}

-- 
~Vinod