lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fe49ef59e93842c6f2beabd130918c9262cef9fe.camel@buserror.net>
Date:   Mon, 06 Aug 2018 19:13:49 -0500
From:   Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Zhao Chenhui <chenhui.zhao@...escale.com>,
        Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] fsl_pmc: update device bindings

On Mon, 2018-04-16 at 10:13 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 02:35:51PM +0800, Ran Wang wrote:
> > From: Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>
> 
> Needs a commit msg and the subject should give some indication of what 
> the update is. And also start with "dt-bindings: ..."

This patch should also come before the patches that use the new binding.

> > -  fsl,mpc8536-pmc: Sleep specifiers consist of three cells, the third of
> > -  which will be ORed into PMCDR upon suspend, and cleared from PMCDR
> > -  upon resume.  The first two cells are as described for fsl,mpc8578-pmc.
> > -  This sleep controller only supports disabling devices during system
> > -  sleep, or permanently.
> > -
> > -  fsl,mpc8548-pmc: Sleep specifiers consist of one or two cells, the
> > -  first of which will be ORed into DEVDISR (and the second into
> > -  DEVDISR2, if present -- this cell should be zero or absent if the
> > -  hardware does not have DEVDISR2) upon a request for permanent device
> > -  disabling.  This sleep controller does not support configuring devices
> > -  to disable during system sleep (unless supported by another compatible
> > -  match), or dynamically.
> 
> You seem to be breaking backwards compatibility with this change. I 
> doubt that is okay on these platforms.

I don't think the sleep specifier stuff ever got used.

-Scott

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ