[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af71656fda0f94e77a136bd50381713020660638.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 14:45:17 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] i2c: Add multi-instantiate pseudo driver
On Tue, 2018-08-07 at 13:33 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07-08-18 13:27, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Hi Hans,
> >
> > > +I2C MULTI INSTANTIATE DRIVER
In the case below, I think it would be slightly better to mention ACPI
here, something like
ACPI I2C ...
Otherwise it sounds a bit confusing why it's in PDx86.
> > > +M: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> > > +L: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
> >
> > Since this driver is about FW bugs, I wonder if
> > platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org isn't the better list here?
>
> Ok, fixed for v4.
>
> > > +S: Maintained
> > > +F: drivers/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
> >
> > I2C parts of the rest looks good from a glimpse...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists