linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] firmware: make sure builtin firmware is page alignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1533608851.20683.78.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Aug 2018 02:27:31 +0000
From:   "Zhang, Ning A" <ning.a.zhang@...el.com>
To:     "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     "pombredanne@...b.com" <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Li, Ting" <ting.li@...el.com>,
        "yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com" <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        "kstewart@...uxfoundation.org" <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "markus@...ppelsdorf.de" <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: make sure builtin firmware is page alignment

在 2018-08-06一的 16:05 +0200，gregkh@...uxfoundation.org写道：
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 01:48:44AM +0000, Zhang, Ning A wrote:
> > 在 2018-08-03五的 12:31 +0200，gregkh@...uxfoundation.org写道：
> > > On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 08:42:25AM +0000, Zhang, Ning A wrote:
> > > > 在 2018-08-03五的 07:39 +0200，Greg KH写道：
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 09:45:21AM +0800, Zhang Ning wrote:
> > > > > > when firmware is in filesystem, request_firmware will load
> > > > > > it,
> > > > > > and copy it to vmalloc memory, that is page align memory.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > but when firmware is builtin, it is 8 bytes or 4 bytes
> > > > > > alignment.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > make sure builtin firmware is page algnment, that can
> > > > > > simplify
> > > > > > algorithm
> > > > > > to handle firmware.
> > > > > 
> > > > > How is it simplified?  I don't see any such change like that
> > > > > here
> > > > > :(
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Thank you for review this patch.
> > > > 
> > > > When driver handles its firmware based on  page, like below:
> > > > 
> > > > 	struct page *p;
> > > > 	p = vmalloc_to_page(fw->data);  // for filesystem
> > > > firmware
> > > > 	p = virt_to_page(fw->data); // for builtin firmware
> > > > 
> > > > but if builtin firmware is not page alignment, page pointer for
> > > > builtin
> > > > firmware is wrong, it contains memory not belong to firmware.
> > > > drivers
> > > > has to use additional code to handle this. 
> > > > 
> > > > if builtin firmware is also page alignment, no need additional
> > > > code
> > > > to
> > > > handle builtin firmware. simplified.
> > > 
> > > But you did not change anything like this in your code, so why
> > > would
> > > I
> > > know this?
> > 
> > I understand it is very difficult to review this patch without
> > context.
> > The driver is not opensource, I can't show the patch for driver.
> 
> Then I can not accept your patch.  Go talk to your corporate lawyers
> about changing core kernel code for a closed source driver and what
> that
> implies about that closed driver (hint, your driver can not be
> closed...) :)

It's very sad, but anyway, thank you for your review.
your review will definitely help us improve our work.

BR.
Ning.

> 
> Then come back with a proper open sourced driver, that's the only way
> Linux drivers can be written sorry.
> 
> best of luck,
> 
> greg k-h
>