[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0100016514bb069d-a6532c9a-b1ca-4eba-8644-c5b3935e3bd8-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:12:06 +0000
From: Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Dennis Zhou <dennisszhou@...il.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, kernel-team@...com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: add percpu populated pages count to meminfo
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/proc/meminfo.c b/fs/proc/meminfo.c
> index 2fb04846ed11..ddd5249692e9 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/meminfo.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/meminfo.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> #include <linux/mman.h>
> #include <linux/mmzone.h>
> #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
> +#include <linux/percpu.h>
> #include <linux/quicklist.h>
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> #include <linux/swap.h>
> @@ -121,6 +122,7 @@ static int meminfo_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> (unsigned long)VMALLOC_TOTAL >> 10);
> show_val_kb(m, "VmallocUsed: ", 0ul);
> show_val_kb(m, "VmallocChunk: ", 0ul);
> + show_val_kb(m, "PercpuPopulated:", pcpu_nr_populated_pages());
Populated? Can we avoid this for simplicities sake: "Percpu"?
We do not count pages that are not present elsewhere either and those
counters do not have "populated" in them.
> int pcpu_nr_empty_pop_pages;
>
> +/*
> + * The number of populated pages in use by the allocator, protected by
> + * pcpu_lock. This number is kept per a unit per chunk (i.e. when a page gets
> + * allocated/deallocated, it is allocated/deallocated in all units of a chunk
> + * and increments/decrements this count by 1).
> + */
> +static int pcpu_nr_populated;
pcpu_nr_pages?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists