[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1808072257080.1672@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 23:10:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com, len.brown@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Rename Denverton and Gemini Lake
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 07:48:51PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 10:35:42AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > On 08/07/2018 10:17 AM, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> > > > Denverton and Gemini Lake are platform names and should not be used for
> > > > Processor Family stuff. The microarchitecture codename should be used.
> > >
> > > Why?
> > >
> > > Denverton is the platform. "Goldmont" is literally the
> > > microarchitecture, and you are suggesting moving *to* the
> > > microarchitecture name, which contradicts the description.
> >
> > All the other (big core) are uarch names. Atom is weird in that it mixes
> > uarch with platform names.
>
> On most big core the platform/SOC just happens to have the same name as the
> uarch. But the identifiers really have to be per SOC because that
> is how Intel model numbers work.
>
> It should be always the SOC.
Which simply does not work. Look at Goldmont Fam 6 Model 5C. The SoCs
with that Fam/Model combination are:
- Apollo Lake
- Broxton (has two platforms: Morganfield and Willowtrail)
It's even worse with Silvermont.
So no, the interesting information is the UARCH and the variant of that,
e.g. UARCH_CLIENT, UARCH_SERVER, UARCH_WHATEVER. All the magic Code Names
and their platform variants are not interesting at all for the Fam/Model
information.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists