[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 00:16:52 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: Huang Shijie <sjhuang@...vatar.ai>,
Alexandre Bailon <abailon@...libre.com>, vkoul@...nel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dave.jiang@...el.com, radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com,
appana.durga.rao@...inx.com, jmkrzyszt@...il.com,
gomonovych@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org,
horms+renesas@...ge.net.au, geert+renesas@...der.be,
shawnguo@...nel.org, baoyou.xie@...aro.org,
michal.simek@...inx.com, baohua@...nel.org,
ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
david.brown@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/46] dmaengine: cppi41: use
dmaenginem_async_device_register to simplify the code
* Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com> [180807 07:05]:
> But does the removed three lines worth over the clarity of how the
> module removal is proceeding?
>
> Alexandre and Tony put lots of effort to the cppi4 driver, I let them
> decide.
Up to you guys as far as I'm concerned.
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists