[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 10:05:56 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] i2c: Add multi-instantiate pseudo driver
Hi,
On 07-08-18 13:45, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-08-07 at 13:33 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 07-08-18 13:27, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>>> +I2C MULTI INSTANTIATE DRIVER
>
> In the case below, I think it would be slightly better to mention ACPI
> here, something like
>
> ACPI I2C ...
>
> Otherwise it sounds a bit confusing why it's in PDx86.
Ok, fixed for the upcoming v4 of this patchset.
Regards,
Hans
>
>>>> +M: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>>>> +L: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
>>>
>>> Since this driver is about FW bugs, I wonder if
>>> platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org isn't the better list here?
>>
>> Ok, fixed for v4.
>>
>>>> +S: Maintained
>>>> +F: drivers/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
>>>
>>> I2C parts of the rest looks good from a glimpse...
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists