[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 11:17:57 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Springer <rspringer@...gle.com>,
John Joseph <jnjoseph@...gle.com>,
Ben Chan <benchan@...omium.org>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] staging: gasket: core: convert remaining info logs
to debug
On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 01:07:38PM -0700, Todd Poynor wrote:
> From: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...gle.com>
>
> Remaining info-level logs in gasket core converted to debug-level; the
> information is not needed during normal system operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...gle.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_core.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_core.c b/drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_core.c
> index 01cafe1ff6605..2741256eacfe8 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/gasket/gasket_core.c
> @@ -1819,7 +1819,7 @@ void gasket_unregister_device(const struct gasket_driver_desc *driver_desc)
> g_descs[desc_idx].driver_desc = NULL;
> mutex_unlock(&g_mutex);
>
> - pr_info("removed %s driver\n", driver_desc->name);
> + pr_debug("removed %s driver\n", driver_desc->name);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(gasket_unregister_device);
>
> @@ -1827,7 +1827,7 @@ static int __init gasket_init(void)
> {
> int i;
>
> - pr_info("Performing one-time init of the Gasket framework.\n");
> + pr_debug("%s\n", __func__);
Lines like this should just be deleted, that is what ftrace is for :)
> /* Check for duplicates and find a free slot. */
> mutex_lock(&g_mutex);
> for (i = 0; i < GASKET_FRAMEWORK_DESC_MAX; i++) {
> @@ -1843,8 +1843,7 @@ static int __init gasket_init(void)
>
> static void __exit gasket_exit(void)
> {
> - /* No deinit/dealloc needed at present. */
> - pr_info("Removing Gasket framework module.\n");
> + pr_debug("%s\n", __func__);
No need to have an exit function at all, right?
I'll take this for now, as this is the last day for me to take patches
for 4.19-rc1, but keep this in mind for the future.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists