lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 8 Aug 2018 14:38:28 +0300
From:   Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@...si.fi>
To:     Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        ", linux-arm-kernel"@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        srv_heupstream <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] mailbox: Add transmit done by blocking option



On 04.08.2018 13:45, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> On 08/03/2018 03:54 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Mikko Perttunen 
>> <mperttunen@...dia.com> wrote:
>>> Add a new TXDONE option, TXDONE_BY_BLOCK. With this option, the
>>> send_data function of the mailbox driver is expected to block until
>>> the message has been sent. The new option is used with the Tegra
>>> Combined UART driver to minimize unnecessary overhead when transmitting
>>> data.
>>>
>> 1) TXDONE_BY_BLOCK flag :-
>>          Have you tried setting the flag 
>> mbox_chan->mbox_client->tx_block ?
> 
> No - I suppose I should have done that. I'm a bit concerned about 
> overhead as send_data may be called thousands of times per second, so I 
> tried to make it as close as possible to the downstream driver that just 
> pokes the mailbox register directly.

I tried using polling in the mailbox framework. Some printing is done 
from atomic context so it seems tx_block cannot be used - 
wait_for_completion_timeout understandably does not work in atomic 
context. I also tried without tx_block, in which case I got some 
horribly garbled output, but "Try increasing MBOX_TX_QUEUE_LEN" was 
readable there.

Any opinions?

Thanks,
Mikko

> 
>>
>> 2) Implementing TEGRA_HSP_MBOX_TYPE_SM :-
>>         In mailbox framework, a controller is a collection of identical
>> channels. That is, instances of the same class.
>>         So ideally, in probe you should populate a controller for each
>> type of channel, i.e, DB, SM, SS and AS.
> 
> Hmm, yes, I guess this would be possible if I change the mailbox core to 
> allow registering multiple controllers per device.
> 
> Thanks!
> Mikko
> 
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists