[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 14:44:14 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] KVM: s390: vsie: simulate VCPU SIE entry/exit
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:51:30 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
> VCPU requests and VCPU blocking right now don't take care of the vSIE
> (as it was not necessary until now). But we want to have VCPU requests
> that will also be handled before running the vSIE again.
>
> So let's simulate a SIE entry when entering the vSIE loop and check
> for PROG_ flags. The existing infrastructure (e.g. exit_sie()) will then
> detect that the SIE (in form of the vSIE execution loop) is running and
> properly kick the vSIE CPU, resulting in it leaving the vSIE loop and
> therefore the vSIE interception handler, allowing it to handle VCPU
> requests.
>
> E.g. if we want to modify the crycb of the VCPU and make sure that any
> masks also get applied to the VSIE crycb shadow (which uses masks from the
> VCPU crycb), we will need a way to hinder the vSIE from running and make
> sure to process the updated crycb before reentering the vSIE again.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 9 ++++++++-
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 1 +
> arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists