[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 18:57:01 +0000
From: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@...inj.com>
To: "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"baolin.wang@...aro.org" <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"orsonzhai@...il.com" <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"zhang.lyra@...il.com" <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"lanqing.liu@...eadtrum.com" <lanqing.liu@...eadtrum.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: spi: Add Spreadtrum SPI controller
documentation
On Wed, 2018-08-08 at 11:54 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 06:35:28PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > On 8 August 2018 at 17:50, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > Right, I don't think we added this yet (if we did I can't see
> > > it). I'd
> > > add a new field to spi_transfer for this, then other controllers
> > > with
> > > the same support can implement it as well and drivers can start
> > > using
> > > it too.
> > OK. So I will name the new filed as 'word_delay', is it OK for you?
>
> Sounds good, yes.
Should it be in µs like the existing iter-transfer delay? I think
perhaps units of cycles of the SPI clock make more sense?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists