linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] ACPI / scan: Initialize status to ACPI_STA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:59:30 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] ACPI / scan: Initialize status to ACPI_STA_DEFAULT

On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09-08-18 11:51, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09-08-18 11:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> I've applied the v4 of this patch and I don't think there are any
>>>> changes from it here.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Correct, there were only changes to the 4th patch in the series.
>>>
>>>> As for the rest of the series I'll wait from comments from Wolfram and
>>>> the other reviewers.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, note if you've taken patch 1 you may also want to take patch 3 which
>>> is an ACPI code cleanup made possible by patch 1 and otherwise is
>>> unrelated.
>>
>>
>> I'm under impression Rafael is going to take entire series (at least
>> for patch 4 I'm expecting to give an Ack).
>
>
> As I mentioned in the coverletter, my idea was to have Rafael take
> patches 1-3 and then merge the 4th patch through the platform/x86
> tree. There are only runtime dependencies between the 2 parts and
> merging them independently should not cause any issues.

I can apply the 4th one too if it is ACKed by everyone with a vested interest.