linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: adav80x: mark expected switch fall-through

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Aug 2018 13:23:58 +0200
From:   Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: adav80x: mark expected switch
 fall-through

On 08/09/2018 11:30 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 02:19:33PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> 
>> @@ -648,6 +648,7 @@ static int adav80x_set_pll(struct snd_soc_component *component, int pll_id,
>>  			pll_ctrl1 |= ADAV80X_PLL_CTRL1_PLLDIV;
>>  			break;
>>  		}
>> +		/* fall through */
>>  	default:
>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>  	}
> 
> Are you *positive* this is a deliberate fall through?

It is. But it might make sense to re-order the code to look like

    case 54000000:
        if (source != ADAV80X_PLL_SRC_XIN)
            return -EINVAL;

        pll_ctrl1 |= ADAV80X_PLL_CTRL1_PLLDIV;
        break;

It is just as many lines added when adding the /* fall through */, but it
makes it more obvious what is going on.

Either way:

Acked-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>