[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180809132657.GA42474@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 06:26:57 -0700
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Akshay Adiga <akshay.adiga@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@...il.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Murilo Opsfelder Araujo <muriloo@...ux.ibm.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] powerpc: Use cpu_smallcore_sibling_mask at SMT
level on bigcores
* Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2018-08-09 11:02:08]:
>
> 3) ppc64_cpu --smt=2
> SMT domain ceases to exist as each domain consists of just one
> group.
>
When seen in isolation, the above looks as if ppc64_cpu --smt=2 o/p says
" SMT domain ceases to exist...."
> @@ -999,7 +1012,17 @@ static void add_cpu_to_masks(int cpu)
> {
> int first_thread = cpu_first_thread_sibling(cpu);
> int chipid = cpu_to_chip_id(cpu);
> - int i;
> +
> + struct thread_groups tg;
> + int i, cpu_group_start = -1;
> +
> + if (has_big_cores) {
> + struct device_node *dn = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
> +
Not checking for validity of dn and no of_node_puts?
> + parse_thread_groups(dn, &tg);
> + cpu_group_start = get_cpu_thread_group_start(cpu, &tg);
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_smallcore_sibling_mask(cpu));
> + }
>
> /*
> * This CPU will not be in the online mask yet so we need to manually
The rest looks good
Powered by blists - more mailing lists