[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVNLu+fDK3UKhVpWYe_+bZN9LQqcib5q=TkqcvgMZ9EQNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:30:54 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] blk-mq: count the hctx as active before allocate tag
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Jianchao Wang
<jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com> wrote:
> Currently, we count the hctx as active after allocate driver tag
> successfully. If a previously inactive hctx try to get tag first
> time, it may fails and need to wait. However, due to the stale tag
> ->active_queues, the other shared-tags users are still able to
> occupy all driver tags while there is someone waiting for tag.
> Consequently, even if the previously inactive hctx is waked up, it
> still may not be able to get a tag and could be starved.
>
> To fix it, we count the hctx as active before try to allocate driver
> tag, then when it is waiting the tag, the other shared-tag users
> will reserve budget for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>
> ---
>
> V3:
> add more detailed comment
>
> V2:
> only invoke blk_mq_tag_busy w/o io scheduler in blk_mq_get_request
>
> block/blk-mq-tag.c | 3 +++
> block/blk-mq.c | 8 ++++++--
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> index 09b2ee6..a8ebcbd 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ bool blk_mq_has_free_tags(struct blk_mq_tags *tags)
>
> /*
> * If a previously inactive queue goes active, bump the active user count.
> + * We need to do this before try to allocate driver tag, then even if fail
> + * to get tag when first time, the other shared-tag users could reserve
> + * budget for it.
> */
> bool __blk_mq_tag_busy(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> {
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index ae44e85..75ac3fbd 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_rq_ctx_init(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data,
> rq->tag = -1;
> rq->internal_tag = tag;
> } else {
> - if (blk_mq_tag_busy(data->hctx)) {
> + if (data->hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED) {
> rq_flags = RQF_MQ_INFLIGHT;
> atomic_inc(&data->hctx->nr_active);
> }
> @@ -367,6 +367,8 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_get_request(struct request_queue *q,
> if (!op_is_flush(op) && e->type->ops.mq.limit_depth &&
> !(data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED))
> e->type->ops.mq.limit_depth(op, data);
> + } else {
> + blk_mq_tag_busy(data->hctx);
> }
>
> tag = blk_mq_get_tag(data);
> @@ -972,6 +974,7 @@ bool blk_mq_get_driver_tag(struct request *rq, struct blk_mq_hw_ctx **hctx,
> .hctx = blk_mq_map_queue(rq->q, rq->mq_ctx->cpu),
> .flags = wait ? 0 : BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT,
> };
> + bool shared;
>
> might_sleep_if(wait);
>
> @@ -981,9 +984,10 @@ bool blk_mq_get_driver_tag(struct request *rq, struct blk_mq_hw_ctx **hctx,
> if (blk_mq_tag_is_reserved(data.hctx->sched_tags, rq->internal_tag))
> data.flags |= BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED;
>
> + shared = blk_mq_tag_busy(data.hctx);
> rq->tag = blk_mq_get_tag(&data);
> if (rq->tag >= 0) {
> - if (blk_mq_tag_busy(data.hctx)) {
> + if (shared) {
> rq->rq_flags |= RQF_MQ_INFLIGHT;
> atomic_inc(&data.hctx->nr_active);
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Thanks,
Ming Lei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists