[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180809150824.GA15116@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:08:24 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: dp83640: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the code comment at the
top of the switch statement with a proper "fall through" annotation for
each case, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1056542 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1339579 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1369526 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c b/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
index 79e9b10..29aa8d7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c
@@ -757,13 +757,16 @@ static int decode_evnt(struct dp83640_private *dp83640,
phy_txts = data;
- switch (words) { /* fall through in every case */
+ switch (words) {
case 3:
dp83640->edata.sec_hi = phy_txts->sec_hi;
+ /* fall through */
case 2:
dp83640->edata.sec_lo = phy_txts->sec_lo;
+ /* fall through */
case 1:
dp83640->edata.ns_hi = phy_txts->ns_hi;
+ /* fall through */
case 0:
dp83640->edata.ns_lo = phy_txts->ns_lo;
}
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists