linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 04/22] s390/zcrypt: Integrate ap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Aug 2018 17:43:36 +0200
From:   Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:     Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, freude@...ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        borntraeger@...ibm.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
        bjsdjshi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, pmorel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        alifm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mjrosato@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        jjherne@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, thuth@...hat.com,
        pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@...hat.com,
        fiuczy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, buendgen@...ibm.com,
        frankja@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/22] s390/zcrypt: Integrate ap_asm.h into
 include/asm/ap.h.

On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 11:18:05AM -0400, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> On 08/09/2018 05:06 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >On Wed,  8 Aug 2018 10:44:14 -0400
> >Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >>From: Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ibm.com>
> >>
> >>Move all the inline functions from the ap bus header
> >>file ap_asm.h into the in-kernel api header file
> >>arch/s390/include/asm/ap.h so that KVM can make use
> >>of all the low level AP functions.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ibm.com>
> >>Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> >You should add your own s-o-b if you are sending on patches written by
> >others (even if it does not matter in the end, when they are merged
> >through a different path anyway.)
> 
> That's rather ironic given I was told in an internal review that I should
> not sign off on patches I did not write.

Please point the one who said that to
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst / Developer's Certificate of Origin

You really should sign off patches you forward, even if you did not write
them on your own.