linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/ACPI/cstate: Output AMD on APCI C1 FFH MWAIT AMD systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJvTdKkXTtPwvYBd5N2AGQiWcn-aAksHCht6BR+4AWP-pmGKNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Aug 2018 12:25:59 -0400
From:   Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To:     Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/ACPI/cstate: Output AMD on APCI C1 FFH MWAIT AMD systems

>> "ACPI FFH INTEL MWAIT 0x%x"

> Should we drop INTEL from the above or not (as suggested later in this thread)?
> It feels like everyone is on the fence about it.

Okay with me to drop the "INTEL" part of this string -- it actually
doesn't add any information.

thanks,
-Len