lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 9 Aug 2018 19:40:55 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, tklauser@...tanz.ch,
        Andrew Waterman <andrew@...ive.com>, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
        linux@...inikbrodowski.net, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, marcus@...pp.se
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] RISC-V: Don't use a global include guard for
 uapi/asm/syscalls.h

On 08/09/2018 06:03 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2018 14:24:22 PDT (-0700), linux@...ck-us.net wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 01:25:24PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>> This file is expected to be included multiple times in the same file in
>>> order to allow the __SYSCALL macro to generate system call tables.  With
>>> a global include guard we end up missing __NR_riscv_flush_icache in the
>>> syscall table, which results in icache flushes that escape the vDSO call
>>> to not actually do anything.
>>>
>>> The fix is to move to per-#define include guards, which allows the
>>> system call tables to actually be populated.  Thanks to Macrus Comstedt
>>> for finding and fixing the bug!
>>>
>>> I also went ahead and fixed the SPDX header to use a //-style comment,
>>> which I've been told is the canonical way to do it.
>>>
>>> Cc: Marcus Comstedt <marcus@...pp.se>
>>> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
>>
>> [Compile-]Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>>
>> on top of linux-next after reverting the version of the patch there.
>>
>> I also tried to run the resulting image (defconfig) with qemu (built
>> from https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu.git), but that still doesn't
>> work. I assume there are still some patches missing ?
> 
> Do you have the PLIC patches?  They'll be necessary to make this all work, and there's a v4 out now that when combined with for-next should get you to userspace.
> 
>     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180809075602.989-1-hch@lst.de/T/#u
> 
Yes, after merging that branch on top of linux-next I can boot into Linux.
If I add my "riscv: Drop setup_initrd" patch as well, I can boot using
initrd, otherwise I have to use virtio-blk-device.

> Also, what is your methodology?  I follow
> 
>     https://wiki.qemu.org/Documentation/Platforms/RISCV
> 
> and could could natively compile and run hello world with an earlier version of Christoph's patch set, which is really only cosmetically different than the v4. I use qemu's master branch as well, which when I tried was exactly 3.0.0-rc3.
> 

That doesn't work for me, possibly because I don't specify a bbl
image with -kernel but vmlinux (using -bios for the bbl image).
I use branch qemu-for-upstream of https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu.git.

Guenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists