[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30317.1533917515@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 17:11:55 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
apparmor@...ts.ubuntu.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
tomoyo-dev-en@...ts.sourceforge.jp, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Subject: Re: BUG: Mount ignores mount options
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> wrote:
> > P.S. And as Al has pointed out, this would require special, per-file
> > system support to determine whether the mount options are conflicting
> > or not....
>
> This extends to LSMs that support mount options (SELinux and Smack)
> as well.
Yes. I'm doing that.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists