[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=V54aOCTLk3J_0=DL0XHJ-Tc77zKzURTwz5PJsioK73+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 13:07:14 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] regulator: add QCOM RPMh regulator driver
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 06:50:59PM -0700, David Collins wrote:
>
>> + switch (rpmh_mode) {
>
>> + default:
>> + mode = REGULATOR_MODE_INVALID;
>> + }
>
> I'm not sure why the break statements are being omitted in default
> cases, but I do find myself stopping and trying to figure it out?
Hopefully <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180810200531.88409-1-dianders@chromium.org/>
addresses this?
Thanks!
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists