[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=X60vTUmaMbwrg_DoUK6JKiN-kMGQ1KUmDJ7YbP+1bLfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 13:14:55 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
Manu Gautam <mgautam@...eaurora.org>,
Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
Varadarajan Narayanan <varada@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] phy: qcom-qmp: Quiet -EPROBE_DEFER from qcom_qmp_phy_probe()
Kishon,
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 3:42 PM, Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> The -EPROBE_DEFER virus demands special case code to avoid printing
> error messages when the error is only -EPROBE_DEFER. Spread the virus
> to a new host: qcom_qmp_phy_probe(). Specifically handle when our
> regulators might not be ready yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
I'm curious what you think of this patch and the next one. Is it
something you'd apply or are you not interested? Either way is fine
(it's just log spam) but I thought I'd check. Thanks! :)
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists