linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] RISC-V: Don't use a global include guard for uapi/asm/syscalls.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <988c739c-a275-c018-2502-08f817b2f818@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Thu, 9 Aug 2018 21:11:34 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, tklauser@...tanz.ch,
        Andrew Waterman <andrew@...ive.com>, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
        linux@...inikbrodowski.net, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, marcus@...pp.se
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] RISC-V: Don't use a global include guard for
 uapi/asm/syscalls.h

On 08/09/2018 08:59 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2018 19:40:55 PDT (-0700), linux@...ck-us.net wrote:
>> On 08/09/2018 06:03 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>> On Thu, 09 Aug 2018 14:24:22 PDT (-0700), linux@...ck-us.net wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 01:25:24PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>>>> This file is expected to be included multiple times in the same file in
>>>>> order to allow the __SYSCALL macro to generate system call tables.  With
>>>>> a global include guard we end up missing __NR_riscv_flush_icache in the
>>>>> syscall table, which results in icache flushes that escape the vDSO call
>>>>> to not actually do anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> The fix is to move to per-#define include guards, which allows the
>>>>> system call tables to actually be populated.  Thanks to Macrus Comstedt
>>>>> for finding and fixing the bug!
>>>>>
>>>>> I also went ahead and fixed the SPDX header to use a //-style comment,
>>>>> which I've been told is the canonical way to do it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: Marcus Comstedt <marcus@...pp.se>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
>>>>
>>>> [Compile-]Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>>>>
>>>> on top of linux-next after reverting the version of the patch there.
>>>>
>>>> I also tried to run the resulting image (defconfig) with qemu (built
>>>> from https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu.git), but that still doesn't
>>>> work. I assume there are still some patches missing ?
>>>
>>> Do you have the PLIC patches?  They'll be necessary to make this all work, and there's a v4 out now that when combined with for-next should get you to userspace.
>>>
>>>     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180809075602.989-1-hch@lst.de/T/#u
>>>
>> Yes, after merging that branch on top of linux-next I can boot into Linux.
>> If I add my "riscv: Drop setup_initrd" patch as well, I can boot using
>> initrd, otherwise I have to use virtio-blk-device.
> 
> Awesome!  If you patch isn't on for-next then I must have missed it, do you mind sending me a pointer?  I can't find any references in my email.
> 
Hmm ... weird. I don't find it either. Maybe I sent it only in my dreams.
I'll send it out for review.

Guenter

>>> Also, what is your methodology?  I follow
>>>
>>>     https://wiki.qemu.org/Documentation/Platforms/RISCV
>>>
>>> and could could natively compile and run hello world with an earlier version of Christoph's patch set, which is really only cosmetically different than the v4. I use qemu's master branch as well, which when I tried was exactly 3.0.0-rc3.
>>>
>>
>> That doesn't work for me, possibly because I don't specify a bbl
>> image with -kernel but vmlinux (using -bios for the bbl image).
>> I use branch qemu-for-upstream of https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu.git.
>>
>> Guenter
>