linux-kernel - Re: i2c:ocores: fixes and polling mechanism

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5011687.103nMUzm2u@harkonnen>
Date:   Sat, 11 Aug 2018 19:13:54 +0200
From:   Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...n.ch>
To:     <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>
Subject: Re: i2c:ocores: fixes and polling mechanism

Hello,

sorry to disturb you all but after one month and a half I never received 
any comment about this patch set and I fear it ended up in a forgotten 
corner. I would like to know if someone is considering it or not.

Thanks :)

On Monday, June 25, 2018 6:13:00 PM CEST Federico Vaga wrote:
> The first two patches fix what I believe are bugs.
> 
> The third patch add a polling mechanism for those systems where
> interrupts are not available.
> 
> All these patches have been tested on a system without interrupt, this
> means that I used my third patch to validate also the other two.
> I would be nice if someone can run verify this also on other system,
> perhaps with interrupts. If you consider it a useful information, I'm not
> using devicetree for this installation.


-- 
Federico Vaga
[BE-CO-HT]