[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180811165728.GS30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 17:57:28 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, arnd@...db.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: drop experimental mark for ARM stack unwinding
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 12:31:27PM +0200, Stefan Agner wrote:
> ARM stack unwinding is upstream since 2009 and has been proven
> working well. At this time it is the preferred stack unwinding
> support since it also supports Thumb 2. Do not scare people
> and drop the EXPERIMENTAL mark.
Actually, there are still cases where we're missing the annotations -
I've seen them in various oops dumps, but I forget where they are.
What I do remember is that they didn't seem trivial to fix at the
time, so it's still recommended that frame pointers are used if you
want to guarantee getting a debuggable oops dump.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 13.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 13Mbps down 490kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists