[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=Ug3oiHOLxYRXtr0LbBUyXjBB=92fAYfpfhEQ8Xih6PNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 17:09:17 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Siddartha Mohanadoss <smohanad@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: pm8998: Add adc node
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> wrote:
> This adds the adc node to pm8998 based on the examples in the
> bindings. It also fixes the order of the included headers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8998.dtsi | 13 ++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8998.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8998.dtsi
> index 92bed1e7d4bb..f70f6101bceb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8998.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8998.dtsi
> @@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> /* Copyright 2018 Google LLC. */
>
> -#include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-vadc.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h>
>
> &spmi_bus {
> pm8998_lsid0: pmic@0 {
> @@ -11,6 +12,16 @@
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
>
> + pm8998_adc: adc@...0 {
> + compatible = "qcom,spmi-adc-rev2";
> + reg = <0x3100>;
> + interrupts = <0x0 0x31 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + #io-channel-cells = <1>;
> + io-channel-ranges;
> + };
I'm a little confused about what the "io-channel-ranges" does here.
The documentation isn't clear at all to me for it. If I'm reading it
right it's also supposed to be for iio-consumers, but you're using it
in a provider. I see you copied this from the example. Maybe the
example is wrong? ...or I'm just confused...
Other than that question, this looks fine to me.
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists