linux-kernel - GNU censorship hit me again = Fed up, I am just going to say this.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <709ad89c-e5b9-7438-1c8c-72325965e2f9@nyt.cloud>
Date:   Sun, 12 Aug 2018 04:00:40 +0200
From:   Ywe Cærlyn <ywe@....cloud>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: GNU censorship hit me again = Fed up, I am just going to say this.

GNU senorship hit me again, on Phoronix. This is LKML, a usenet mailing 
list. So lets try again here.

Linus Torvalds, Richard Stallman, and Andrew Tanenbaum all are 
pedophilia victims. And oddly enough think they are gods because of  this.

On Linux forums, fanboys attack, because they sympathize, with this 
pantheon.

In source, GNU zealousy and the same means among others

1000 HZ Kernel Patch.
10 ms filter in sched.c
and this is just from a quick look at source.

And Phoronix mails the list and Linus pulls patches from the kernel, 
without knowing what they were, based on average performance testing. 
Average performance in a lot of cases, is not important, but rather peak 
  jitter. Gettig peak jitter down, means best performance, or "average 
performance" will not even be displayed on screen, because of jitter 
bottlenecks.

And in earlier "ricer" (abuse victim slang?) discussions it is 
supposedly obvious that turning certain optimizations on is useless. Yet 
  nobody sees "defer pop" being on, as usless, that only contributes 
jitter.

Obviously this is poor patching, poor understanding, and a poor 
internet. And LKML still is ascii, when most of the world has moved to 
better technology. Better technology, with more ID, for less obscure 
behaviour.

Will Linus scubadiving help?

No.

Tanenbaum writing books with circus on them?

No.

Stallman dancing strange dances?

No.

What is needed is a coherent monotheistic philosophy. That is where 
civilization comes from, and a good word to all, also abuse victims, 
that this is not about abuse. Neither communism, nor facism.

I am even trying a zén-concept for maximal desirelessness.

"Hacker"-space was actually already quite monotheistic. And it was never 
  intended to be poor, neither spiritually nor financially.

This is what needs to happen in computing space. Obviously.

A good and moral behaviour pattern, an adhérance to religion that 
teaches monotheism. Overriding vain egoes, and diciplining it to 
understand reality, and society at large.

I hope you understand.

Peace.

www.nyt.cloud