linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] clk: clk: Add functions to save/restore clock context en-masse

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ff0fdd50-a674-9475-290a-053ebf415ff8@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Aug 2018 18:25:30 +0300
From:   Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>
CC:     <sboyd@...nel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <d-gerlach@...com>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] clk: clk: Add functions to save/restore clock
 context en-masse

On 10/07/18 08:56, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com> [180621 01:18]:
>> Deep enough power saving mode can result into losing context of the clock
>> registers also, and they need to be restored once coming back from the power
>> saving mode. Hence add functions to save/restore clock context.
> 
> Patches 1 to 3 look good to me:
> 
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> 
> Stephen, if no more comments, can you please set up an immutable
> branch for me as otherwise the last patch might cause merge
> conflicts?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tony
> 

Stephen, Mike,

Any concerns about this series? This series touches core clock APIs 
slightly, but from my side these look fine. Do you want to pick #1-#3 up 
yourself or do you want me to setup a pull-req? Patch #4 seems like 
should go in via Tony's tree.

-Tero
--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki