[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180813194051.GA11620@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 21:40:51 +0200
From: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@...rosoft.com>
Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] vmbus: add driver_override support
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 07:30:50PM +0000, Michael Kelley (EOSG) wrote:
> From: kys@...uxonhyperv.com <kys@...uxonhyperv.com> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 4:06 PM
>
> > From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> >
> > Add support for overriding the default driver for a VMBus device
> > in the same way that it can be done for PCI devices. This patch
> > adds the /sys/bus/vmbus/devices/.../driver_override file
> > and the logic for matching.
> >
> > This is used by driverctl tool to do driver override.
> > https://gitlab.com/driverctl/driverctl
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
> > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
> > index b1b548a21f91..e6d8fdac6d8b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
> > @@ -498,6 +498,54 @@ static ssize_t device_show(struct device *dev,
> > }
> > static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(device);
> >
> > +static ssize_t driver_override_store(struct device *dev,
> > + struct device_attribute *attr,
> > + const char *buf, size_t count)
> > +{
> > + struct hv_device *hv_dev = device_to_hv_device(dev);
> > + char *driver_override, *old, *cp;
> > +
> > + /* We need to keep extra room for a newline */
> > + if (count >= (PAGE_SIZE - 1))
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> Does 'count' actually have a relationship to PAGE_SIZE, or
> is PAGE_SIZE just used as an arbitrary size limit? I'm
> wondering what happens on ARM64 with a 64K page size,
> for example. If it's just arbitrary, coding such a constant
> would be better.
sysfs buffers are PAGE_SIZE big.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists