[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180813194152.GG5081@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 13:41:52 -0600
From: Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc: swboyd@...omium.org, evgreen@...omium.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
rplsssn@...eaurora.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND RFC 2/4] drivers: pinctrl: qcom: add wakeup gpio
map for sdm845
On Wed, Aug 01 2018 at 14:04 -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 01 2018 at 02:42 -0600, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 03:00:19 +0100,
>>Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>Add GPIO to PDC pin map for the SDM845 SoC.
>>>
>>>Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>
>>>---
>>> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm845.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+)
>>>
>>>diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm845.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm845.c
>>>index 2ab7a8885757..e93660922dc2 100644
>>>--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm845.c
>>>+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm845.c
>>>@@ -1277,6 +1277,80 @@ static const struct msm_pingroup sdm845_groups[] = {
>>> UFS_RESET(ufs_reset, 0x99f000),
>>> };
>>>
>>>+static struct msm_pinctrl_pdc_map sdm845_wakeup_gpios[] = {
>>
>>[huge array]
>>
>>>+};
>>
>>Why isn't that array part of the DT? I'd expect other SoCs to
>>eventually use a similar mechanism, no?
>>
>I agree and it should be.
>
>One place I am thinking is to add it to the DT definition of PDC
>controller as a data argument -
>
> tlmm: pinctrl@...000{
> [...]
> interrupts-extended = <&pdc 30 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 1>,
> <&pdc 31 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 3>,
> <&pdc 32 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 5>,
> ^
> |--- Provide the GPIO
> for the PDC pin here.
> };
>
> pdc: interrupt-controller@...0000 {
> compatible = "qcom,sdm845-pdc";
> reg = <0xb220000 0x30000>;
> qcom,pdc-ranges = <0 512 94>, <94 641 15>, <115 662 7>;
> #interrupt-cells = <3>; <-------- Increase this from 2 ?
> interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> interrupt-controller;
> };
>
>Would that be acceptable?
>
Any ideas on how to do this better?
>Thanks,
>Lina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists