[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180815092625.1ab4109d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 09:26:25 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the kbuild tree
Hi all,
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 14:47:36 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got conflicts in:
>
> arch/arm64/Kconfig
> arch/openrisc/Kconfig
>
> between commit:
>
> 1572497cb0e6 ("kconfig: include common Kconfig files from top-level Kconfig")
>
> from the kbuild tree and commits:
>
> 78ae2e1cd845 ("arm64: Use the new GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER")
> c5ca4560de0f ("openrisc: Use the new GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER")
>
> from the tip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index a3de6ad666d4,3d1011957823..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@@ -278,9 -265,10 +279,6 @@@ config ARCH_SUPPORTS_UPROBE
> config ARCH_PROC_KCORE_TEXT
> def_bool y
>
> - config MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
> - def_bool y
> -source "init/Kconfig"
> -
> -source "kernel/Kconfig.freezer"
> --
> source "arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms"
>
> menu "Bus support"
> diff --cc arch/openrisc/Kconfig
> index fee9d91a66e6,dfb6a79ba7ff..000000000000
> --- a/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
> @@@ -71,9 -69,10 +71,6 @@@ config STACKTRACE_SUPPOR
> config LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
> def_bool y
>
> - config MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
> - def_bool y
> -source "init/Kconfig"
> -
> -source "kernel/Kconfig.freezer"
> --
> menu "Processor type and features"
>
> choice
This is now a conflict between Linus' tree and the kbuild tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists