[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180814085709.GG21634@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 10:57:09 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Karol Herbst <karolherbst@...il.com>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Ville Syrjälä
<ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@...m.mit.edu>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] drm/nouveau: Fix deadlock with fb_helper with
async RPM requests
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:53:32AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 03:16:43PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > I'm sure I don't need to tell you that fb_helper's locking is a mess.
>
> Uh, loaded statement :-) Especially since we've just reworked all the
> fbdev locking to untangle it from drm_modeset locking. What's still a mess
> about it? It's documented, and very clearly wrapped around all the
> drm_modeset locks. If there's gaps, please bring them up.
>
> > That being said; fb_helper's locking mess can seriously complicate the
> > runtime suspend/resume operations of drivers because it can invoke
> > atomic commits and connector probing from anywhere that calls
> > drm_fb_helper_hotplug_event(). Since most drivers use
> > drm_fb_helper_output_poll_changed() as their output_poll_changed
> > handler, this can happen in every single context that can fire off a
> > hotplug event. An example:
> >
> > [ 246.669625] INFO: task kworker/4:0:37 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> > [ 246.673398] Not tainted 4.18.0-rc5Lyude-Test+ #2
> > [ 246.675271] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> > [ 246.676527] kworker/4:0 D 0 37 2 0x80000000
> > [ 246.677580] Workqueue: events output_poll_execute [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.678704] Call Trace:
> > [ 246.679753] __schedule+0x322/0xaf0
> > [ 246.680916] schedule+0x33/0x90
> > [ 246.681924] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x15/0x20
> > [ 246.683023] __mutex_lock+0x569/0x9a0
> > [ 246.684035] ? kobject_uevent_env+0x117/0x7b0
> > [ 246.685132] ? drm_fb_helper_hotplug_event.part.28+0x20/0xb0 [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.686179] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
> > [ 246.687278] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
> > [ 246.688307] drm_fb_helper_hotplug_event.part.28+0x20/0xb0 [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.689420] drm_fb_helper_output_poll_changed+0x23/0x30 [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.690462] drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event+0x2a/0x30 [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.691570] output_poll_execute+0x198/0x1c0 [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.692611] process_one_work+0x231/0x620
> > [ 246.693725] worker_thread+0x214/0x3a0
> > [ 246.694756] kthread+0x12b/0x150
> > [ 246.695856] ? wq_pool_ids_show+0x140/0x140
> > [ 246.696888] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70
> > [ 246.697998] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
> > [ 246.699034] INFO: task kworker/0:1:60 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> > [ 246.700153] Not tainted 4.18.0-rc5Lyude-Test+ #2
> > [ 246.701182] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> > [ 246.702278] kworker/0:1 D 0 60 2 0x80000000
> > [ 246.703293] Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work
> > [ 246.704393] Call Trace:
> > [ 246.705403] __schedule+0x322/0xaf0
> > [ 246.706439] ? wait_for_completion+0x104/0x190
> > [ 246.707393] schedule+0x33/0x90
> > [ 246.708375] schedule_timeout+0x3a5/0x590
> > [ 246.709289] ? mark_held_locks+0x58/0x80
> > [ 246.710208] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2c/0x40
> > [ 246.711222] ? wait_for_completion+0x104/0x190
> > [ 246.712134] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf4/0x190
> > [ 246.713094] ? wait_for_completion+0x104/0x190
> > [ 246.713964] wait_for_completion+0x12c/0x190
> > [ 246.714895] ? wake_up_q+0x80/0x80
> > [ 246.715727] ? get_work_pool+0x90/0x90
> > [ 246.716649] flush_work+0x1c9/0x280
> > [ 246.717483] ? flush_workqueue_prep_pwqs+0x1b0/0x1b0
> > [ 246.718442] __cancel_work_timer+0x146/0x1d0
> > [ 246.719247] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x13/0x20
> > [ 246.720043] drm_kms_helper_poll_disable+0x1f/0x30 [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.721123] nouveau_pmops_runtime_suspend+0x3d/0xb0 [nouveau]
> > [ 246.721897] pci_pm_runtime_suspend+0x6b/0x190
> > [ 246.722825] ? pci_has_legacy_pm_support+0x70/0x70
> > [ 246.723737] __rpm_callback+0x7a/0x1d0
> > [ 246.724721] ? pci_has_legacy_pm_support+0x70/0x70
> > [ 246.725607] rpm_callback+0x24/0x80
> > [ 246.726553] ? pci_has_legacy_pm_support+0x70/0x70
> > [ 246.727376] rpm_suspend+0x142/0x6b0
> > [ 246.728185] pm_runtime_work+0x97/0xc0
> > [ 246.728938] process_one_work+0x231/0x620
> > [ 246.729796] worker_thread+0x44/0x3a0
> > [ 246.730614] kthread+0x12b/0x150
> > [ 246.731395] ? wq_pool_ids_show+0x140/0x140
> > [ 246.732202] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70
> > [ 246.732878] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
> > [ 246.733768] INFO: task kworker/4:2:422 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> > [ 246.734587] Not tainted 4.18.0-rc5Lyude-Test+ #2
> > [ 246.735393] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> > [ 246.736113] kworker/4:2 D 0 422 2 0x80000080
> > [ 246.736789] Workqueue: events_long drm_dp_mst_link_probe_work [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.737665] Call Trace:
> > [ 246.738490] __schedule+0x322/0xaf0
> > [ 246.739250] schedule+0x33/0x90
> > [ 246.739908] rpm_resume+0x19c/0x850
> > [ 246.740750] ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90
> > [ 246.741541] __pm_runtime_resume+0x4e/0x90
> > [ 246.742370] nv50_disp_atomic_commit+0x31/0x210 [nouveau]
> > [ 246.743124] drm_atomic_commit+0x4a/0x50 [drm]
> > [ 246.743775] restore_fbdev_mode_atomic+0x1c8/0x240 [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.744603] restore_fbdev_mode+0x31/0x140 [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.745373] drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x54/0xb0 [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.746220] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x2d/0x50 [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.746884] drm_fb_helper_hotplug_event.part.28+0x96/0xb0 [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.747675] drm_fb_helper_output_poll_changed+0x23/0x30 [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.748544] drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event+0x2a/0x30 [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.749439] nv50_mstm_hotplug+0x15/0x20 [nouveau]
> > [ 246.750111] drm_dp_send_link_address+0x177/0x1c0 [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.750764] drm_dp_check_and_send_link_address+0xa8/0xd0 [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.751602] drm_dp_mst_link_probe_work+0x51/0x90 [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.752314] process_one_work+0x231/0x620
> > [ 246.752979] worker_thread+0x44/0x3a0
> > [ 246.753838] kthread+0x12b/0x150
> > [ 246.754619] ? wq_pool_ids_show+0x140/0x140
> > [ 246.755386] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70
> > [ 246.756162] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
> > [ 246.756847]
> > Showing all locks held in the system:
> > [ 246.758261] 3 locks held by kworker/4:0/37:
> > [ 246.759016] #0: 00000000f8df4d2d ((wq_completion)"events"){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1b3/0x620
> > [ 246.759856] #1: 00000000e6065461 ((work_completion)(&(&dev->mode_config.output_poll_work)->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1b3/0x620
> > [ 246.760670] #2: 00000000cb66735f (&helper->lock){+.+.}, at: drm_fb_helper_hotplug_event.part.28+0x20/0xb0 [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.761516] 2 locks held by kworker/0:1/60:
> > [ 246.762274] #0: 00000000fff6be0f ((wq_completion)"pm"){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1b3/0x620
> > [ 246.762982] #1: 000000005ab44fb4 ((work_completion)(&dev->power.work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1b3/0x620
> > [ 246.763890] 1 lock held by khungtaskd/64:
> > [ 246.764664] #0: 000000008cb8b5c3 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x23/0x185
> > [ 246.765588] 5 locks held by kworker/4:2/422:
> > [ 246.766440] #0: 00000000232f0959 ((wq_completion)"events_long"){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1b3/0x620
> > [ 246.767390] #1: 00000000bb59b134 ((work_completion)(&mgr->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1b3/0x620
> > [ 246.768154] #2: 00000000cb66735f (&helper->lock){+.+.}, at: drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x4c/0xb0 [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.768966] #3: 000000004c8f0b6b (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}, at: restore_fbdev_mode_atomic+0x4b/0x240 [drm_kms_helper]
> > [ 246.769921] #4: 000000004c34a296 (crtc_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}, at: drm_modeset_backoff+0x8a/0x1b0 [drm]
> > [ 246.770839] 1 lock held by dmesg/1038:
> > [ 246.771739] 2 locks held by zsh/1172:
> > [ 246.772650] #0: 00000000836d0438 (&tty->ldisc_sem){++++}, at: ldsem_down_read+0x37/0x40
> > [ 246.773680] #1: 000000001f4f4d48 (&ldata->atomic_read_lock){+.+.}, at: n_tty_read+0xc1/0x870
> >
> > [ 246.775522] =============================================
> >
> > After trying dozens of different solutions, I found one very simple one
> > that should also have the benefit of preventing us from having to fight
> > locking for the rest of our lives. So, we work around these deadlocks by
> > deferring all fbcon hotplug events that happen after the runtime suspend
> > process starts until after the device is resumed again.
> >
> > Changes since v6:
> > - Remove unused nouveau_fbcon_hotplugged_in_suspend() - Ilia
> >
> > Changes since v5:
> > - Come up with the (hopefully final) solution for solving this dumb
> > problem, one that is a lot less likely to cause issues with locking in
> > the future. This should work around all deadlock conditions with fbcon
> > brought up thus far.
> >
> > Changes since v4:
> > - Add nouveau_fbcon_hotplugged_in_suspend() to workaround deadlock
> > condition that Lukas described
> > - Just move all of this out of drm_fb_helper. It seems that other DRM
> > drivers have already figured out other workarounds for this. If other
> > drivers do end up needing this in the future, we can just move this
> > back into drm_fb_helper again.
> >
> > Changes since v3:
> > - Actually check if fb_helper is NULL in both new helpers
> > - Actually check drm_fbdev_emulation in both new helpers
> > - Don't fire off a fb_helper hotplug unconditionally; only do it if
> > the following conditions are true (as otherwise, calling this in the
> > wrong spot will cause Bad Things to happen):
> > - fb_helper hotplug handling was actually inhibited previously
> > - fb_helper actually has a delayed hotplug pending
> > - fb_helper is actually bound
> > - fb_helper is actually initialized
> > - Add __must_check to drm_fb_helper_suspend_hotplug(). There's no
> > situation where a driver would actually want to use this without
> > checking the return value, so enforce that
> > - Rewrite and clarify the documentation for both helpers.
> > - Make sure to return true in the drm_fb_helper_suspend_hotplug() stub
> > that's provided in drm_fb_helper.h when CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION
> > isn't enabled
> > - Actually grab the toplevel fb_helper lock in
> > drm_fb_helper_resume_hotplug(), since it's possible other activity
> > (such as a hotplug) could be going on at the same time the driver
> > calls drm_fb_helper_resume_hotplug(). We need this to check whether or
> > not drm_fb_helper_hotplug_event() needs to be called anyway
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
> > Cc: Karol Herbst <karolherbst@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.h | 5 ++
> > 4 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> > index 8b522a9b12f6..a0772389ed90 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> > @@ -2049,7 +2049,7 @@ nv50_disp_atomic_state_alloc(struct drm_device *dev)
> > static const struct drm_mode_config_funcs
> > nv50_disp_func = {
> > .fb_create = nouveau_user_framebuffer_create,
> > - .output_poll_changed = drm_fb_helper_output_poll_changed,
> > + .output_poll_changed = nouveau_fbcon_output_poll_changed,
> > .atomic_check = nv50_disp_atomic_check,
> > .atomic_commit = nv50_disp_atomic_commit,
> > .atomic_state_alloc = nv50_disp_atomic_state_alloc,
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c
> > index 1d36ab5d4796..4b873e668b26 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c
> > @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ nouveau_user_framebuffer_create(struct drm_device *dev,
> >
> > static const struct drm_mode_config_funcs nouveau_mode_config_funcs = {
> > .fb_create = nouveau_user_framebuffer_create,
> > - .output_poll_changed = drm_fb_helper_output_poll_changed,
> > + .output_poll_changed = nouveau_fbcon_output_poll_changed,
> > };
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
> > index 85c1f10bc2b6..8cf966690963 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c
> > @@ -466,6 +466,7 @@ nouveau_fbcon_set_suspend_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > console_unlock();
> >
> > if (state == FBINFO_STATE_RUNNING) {
> > + nouveau_fbcon_hotplug_resume(drm->fbcon);
> > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(drm->dev->dev);
> > pm_runtime_put_sync(drm->dev->dev);
> > }
> > @@ -487,6 +488,61 @@ nouveau_fbcon_set_suspend(struct drm_device *dev, int state)
> > schedule_work(&drm->fbcon_work);
> > }
> >
> > +void
> > +nouveau_fbcon_output_poll_changed(struct drm_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(dev);
> > + struct nouveau_fbdev *fbcon = drm->fbcon;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!fbcon)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&fbcon->hotplug_lock);
> > +
> > + ret = pm_runtime_get(dev->dev);
> > + if (ret == 1 || ret == -EACCES) {
> > + drm_fb_helper_hotplug_event(&fbcon->helper);
> > +
> > + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev->dev);
> > + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev->dev);
> > + } else if (ret == 0) {
> > + /* If the GPU was already in the process of suspending before
> > + * this event happened, then we can't block here as we'll
> > + * deadlock the runtime pmops since they wait for us to
> > + * finish. So, just defer this event for when we runtime
> > + * resume again. It will be handled by fbcon_work.
> > + */
>
> Hm, I thought pm_runtime_get() never fails, and you need one of the other
> variants if you want special behaviour here? Like
> pm_runtime_get_noresume().
TIL that there's both pm_runtime_get() and pm_runtime_get_sync(). Code
looks correct.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists