linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] lightnvm: move bad block and chunk state logic to core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Aug 2018 13:22:26 +0000
From:   Javier Gonzalez <javier@...xlabs.com>
To:     Matias Bjørling <mb@...htnvm.io>
CC:     "Konopko, Igor J" <igor.j.konopko@...el.com>,
        "marcin.dziegielewski@...el.com" <marcin.dziegielewski@...el.com>,
        Hans Holmberg <hans.holmberg@...xlabs.com>,
        Heiner Litz <hlitz@...c.edu>,
        Young Tack Tack Jin <youngtack.jin@...cuitblvd.com>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] lightnvm: move bad block and chunk state logic to
 core

> On 14 Aug 2018, at 15.17, Matias Bjørling <mb@...htnvm.io> wrote:
> 
> This patch moves the 1.2 and 2.0 block/chunk metadata retrieval to
> core.
> 
> Javier, would you like me to pick up your 1.2 chunk state patch and
> merge it into this one, or would you like to rebase on this later when
> it has been reviewed?
> 

This is great. Thanks! Let me look into the patch itself, test, etc. I'm
ok with merging the 1.2 chunk fixes here. I'll then rebase the 2.0 WP
recovery patches that I have staging and submit them.

Javier

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)