[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f9ad4ed4685e51a7b0378f11d3ce9d0a76235095.camel@wdc.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 15:44:57 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
To: "hare@...e.de" <hare@...e.de>, "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC: "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"keith.busch@...el.com" <keith.busch@...el.com>,
"linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"hare@...e.com" <hare@...e.com>,
"sagi@...mberg.me" <sagi@...mberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] nvme: register ns_id attributes as default sysfs
groups
On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 17:39 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> While I have considered having nvme_nvm_register_sysfs() returning a
> pointer I would then have to remove the 'static' declaration from the
> nvm_dev_attr_group_12/20.
> Which I didn't really like, either.
Hmm ... I don't see why the static declaration would have to be removed from
nvm_dev_attr_group_12/20 if nvme_nvm_register_sysfs() would return a pointer?
Am I perhaps missing something?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists