linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH net-next 5/9] net: hns3: Fix for vf vlan delete failed problem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <F4CC6FACFEB3C54C9141D49AD221F7F93BE87166@FRAEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Aug 2018 16:35:36 +0000
From:   Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     "Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen)" <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
        "lipeng (Y)" <lipeng321@...wei.com>,
        "mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com" <mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        linyunsheng <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 5/9] net: hns3: Fix for vf vlan delete failed
 problem

Hi Dave,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 4:57 PM
> To: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>
> Cc: Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen) <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>; lipeng (Y)
> <lipeng321@...wei.com>; mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Linuxarm
> <linuxarm@...wei.com>; linyunsheng <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/9] net: hns3: Fix for vf vlan delete
> failed problem
> 
> From: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>
> Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2018 10:47:34 +0100
> 
> > Fixes: 9dba194574e3 ("{topost} net: hns3: fix for vlan table
> problem")
> 
> This commit ID doesn't exist.

Thanks for catching this. This commit ID was from our internal branch
and ideally should have been from net-next - I should have caught this
earlier, sorry for this!

I have for now dropped this patch from the series as there is another
related patch(being referred in the Fixes string) that would need to
be merged with this patch before sending to net-next. Therefore, will
refloat this patch along with other related patch later in next cycle.

> 
> Also, I really don't think the string "{topost}" would be in the commit
> header line.

Yes, this is stray and will be removed when this patch is sent next.

Thank you
Salil