[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1534297365.3035.0.camel@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 01:42:45 +0000
From: "Ong, Hean Loong" <hean.loong.ong@...el.com>
To: "dinguyen@...nel.org" <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"airlied@...ux.ie" <airlied@...ux.ie>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"See, Chin Liang" <chin.liang.see@...el.com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"Vandervennet, Yves" <yves.vandervennet@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH10 0/3] Intel FPGA Video and Image Processing Suite
On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 10:48 -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
> On 08/14/2018 03:57 AM, Hean-Loong, Ong wrote:
> >
> > From: Ong, Hean Loong <hean.loong.ong@...el.com>
> >
> > The FPGA FrameBuffer Soft IP could be seen as the GPU and the DRM
> > driver patch
> > here is allocating memory for information to be streamed from the
> > ARM/Linux
> > to the display port. Basically the driver just wraps the
> > information such as
> > the pixels to be drawn by the FPGA FrameBuffer 2.
> >
> > The piece of hardware in discussion is the SoC FPGA where Linux
> > runs on the
> > ARM chip and the FGPA is driven by its NIOS soft core with its own
> > proprietary firmware.
> This driver doesn't have to ARM specific does it?
>
> >
> >
> > For example the application from the ARM Linux would have to write
> > information
> > on the /dev/fb0 with the information stored in the SDRAM to be
> > fetched by the
> > FPGA framebuffer IP and displayed on the Display Port Monitor.
> >
> >
> > Ong Hean Loong (2):
> > ARM:socfpga-defconfig Intel FPGA Video and Image Processing Suite
> > ARM:drm ivip Intel FPGA Video and Image Processing Suite
> >
> > Ong, Hean Loong (1):
> > ARM:dt-bindings:display Intel FPGA Video and Image Processing
> > Suite
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/display/altr,vip-fb2.txt | 63 +++++++
> > arch/arm/configs/socfpga_defconfig | 5 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 2 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/ivip/Kconfig | 14 ++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/ivip/Makefile | 9 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/ivip/intel_vip_conn.c | 95
> > ++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/ivip/intel_vip_core.c | 161
> > ++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/ivip/intel_vip_drv.h | 52 ++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/ivip/intel_vip_of.c | 193
> > ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 10 files changed, 595 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/altr,vip-fb2.txt
> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/ivip/Kconfig
> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/ivip/Makefile
> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/ivip/intel_vip_conn.c
> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/ivip/intel_vip_core.c
> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/ivip/intel_vip_drv.h
> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/ivip/intel_vip_of.c
> >
> Can you clarify your commit header? What is "PATCH10", is it version
> 10?
> If so, it should be "PATCHv10".
>
> You're also missing a few other maintainers in your CC list, the "DRM
> DRIVERS AND MISC GPU PATCHES" people.
>
Noted
> Dinh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists