linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/107] 4.9.120-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Aug 2018 11:55:53 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@...wrt.com>
Cc:     Sven Joachim <svenjoac@....de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/107] 4.9.120-stable review

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 08:27:00PM +0200, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
> if i fix the other error (can be reproduced with disable smp on standard
> i386 build)
> 
> another raises up again related to smp. to be serious. this patchset of x86
> patches is absolutelly broken and put together without any care. not a
> simple compile test has been done
> 
> sorry for beeing a little bit upset. i'm sure i will find other bugs if i go
> deeper
> 

It might possibly help if you would consider to publish your configuration(s).

As for "not a simple compile test has been done", please have a look
at http://kerneltests.org/builders. I guess those compile (and boot)
tests don't count as "simple". I assume the same applies to all the
builds done by 0day and all the other test builders.

Guenter