linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf tools: Make check-headers.sh check based on kernel dir

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Aug 2018 11:35:51 +1000
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alexander.kapshuk@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf tools: Make check-headers.sh check based on kernel dir

Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> writes:
> Em Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 08:02:48PM +1000, Michael Ellerman escreveu:
>> Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> writes:
>> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 03:06:44PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> >> Em Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 09:27:26AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
>> >> > sry.. Arnaldo, would you change it for simple cd (attached below)
>> >> > or should I send the fix?
>
>> >> Nah, I'm folding this in, to keep it bisectable.
>
>> > any chance one of your docker tests could run build in sh/zsh? ;-)
>
> It does already, see below :-)
>
>> Just using an Ubuntu image, where /bin/sh == dash should work, that's
>> how I hit it.
>
> So, I do the tests only prior to pushing to Ingo, so didn't catch this,
> lemme check, put that change back on, start a ubuntu:18.04 perf build
> container, try to build, see if it would fail, yeah, I'd have detected
> this before pushing to Ingo, so probably I have to run the tests before
> pushing to my acme/perf/core branch, will try to operate like that from
> now on.

Or you can tell me to test a different branch :)

cheers