linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.17 00/97] 4.17.15-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180816100842.GD9141@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:08:42 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.17 00/97] 4.17.15-stable review

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 03:31:51PM -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 07:16:12PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.17.15 release.
> > There are 97 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Thu Aug 16 17:14:15 UTC 2018.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> 4.17 looks good. I included -rc2 and -rc3 partial results below - both
> have been manually reviewed based on the data that we have so far.
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.

THanks for doing all of these tests and letting me know.

greg k-h