[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <265ca413-110b-cc93-ae63-e9780a96358e@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 14:08:46 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
Kemi Wang <kemi.wang@...el.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Jia He <jia.he@...-semitech.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] mm/memory_hotplug: drop intermediate
__offline_pages
On 16.08.2018 13:44, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 12:06:24 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> -static int __ref __offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
>> - unsigned long end_pfn)
>> +/* Must be protected by mem_hotplug_begin() or a device_lock */
>> +int offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
>
> You lose the __ref marking. Does this introduce warnings since
> offline_pages() calls (at least) zone_pcp_update() which is marked
> __meminit.
>
Good point, I'll recompile and in case there is a warning, keep the
__ref. Thanks!
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists