[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180816135300.GC2960@e110439-lin>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 14:53:00 +0100
From: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/14] sched/cpufreq: uclamp: add utilization clamping
for FAIR tasks
On 15-Aug 17:30, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 08/06/2018 06:39 PM, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >+#else /* CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */
> >+static inline unsigned int uclamp_value(unsigned int cpu, int clamp_id)
> >+{
> >+ return uclamp_none(clamp_id);
> >+}
>
> Looks like that uclamp_value() is not used outside CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK areas.
Yes, you right... I use it on some debug patches I'm tracking on
top of the series... but I can defenitivel drop it in v4.
Cheers Patrick
--
#include <best/regards.h>
Patrick Bellasi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists