[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1534437435-51605-3-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:37:14 +0800
From: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
To: <dsterba@...e.com>
CC: <jbacik@...com>, <clm@...com>, <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCHv4 2/3] btrfs: change btrfs_free_reserved_bytes to be void funtion
btrfs_free_reserved_bytes use the variable "ret" for return return value,
but it is not modified after initialzation. Further, I find that any of
the callers do not handle the return value, so it is safe to drop the
unneeded "ret" and make it to be void function.
Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index f77226d..ff305f5 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -6464,11 +6464,10 @@ static int btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache,
* reserve set to 0 in order to clear the reservation.
*/
-static int btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache,
- u64 num_bytes, int delalloc)
+static void btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache,
+ u64 num_bytes, int delalloc)
{
struct btrfs_space_info *space_info = cache->space_info;
- int ret = 0;
spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
spin_lock(&cache->lock);
@@ -6481,7 +6480,6 @@ static int btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache,
cache->delalloc_bytes -= num_bytes;
spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
- return ret;
}
void btrfs_prepare_extent_commit(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
{
--
1.7.12.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists