[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29a2c884-836c-d659-ee39-2c865943a3f5@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 20:43:00 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...hadventures.net>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: mhocko@...e.com, vbabka@...e.cz, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
yasu.isimatu@...il.com, jonathan.cameron@...wei.com,
Pavel.Tatashin@...rosoft.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Drop mem_blk check from
unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes
On 15.08.2018 16:42, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
>
> Before calling to unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(),
> remove_memory_section() already checks if we got a valid memory_block.
>
> No need to check that again in unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes().
>
> If more functions start using unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes() in the
> future, we can always place a WARN_ON to catch null mem_blk's so we can
> safely back off.
>
> For now, let us keep the check in remove_memory_section() since it is the
> only function that uses it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> ---
> drivers/base/node.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
> index 1ac4c36e13bb..dd3bdab230b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/node.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/node.c
> @@ -455,10 +455,6 @@ int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk,
> NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, unlinked_nodes, GFP_KERNEL);
> unsigned long pfn, sect_start_pfn, sect_end_pfn;
>
> - if (!mem_blk) {
> - NODEMASK_FREE(unlinked_nodes);
> - return -EFAULT;
> - }
> if (!unlinked_nodes)
> return -ENOMEM;
> nodes_clear(*unlinked_nodes);
>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists