[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180817093828.GA10337@jagdpanzerIV>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 18:38:28 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
Al Stone <ahs3@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
x86@...nel.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] console: Add console=auto option
On (08/16/18 13:39), Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
> + auto [X86] Enable ACPI SPCR console
^^^^
And arm64?
Any chance we can rename param to "spcr" or something more clear?
To explicitly state what exactly it's going to do. `auto' sounds
too general and doesn't tell me that much. I'm probably the only
here who can't see a connection between "auto" and "SPCR", but
still.
One more thing, as far as I can tell, acpi_parse_spcr() can fail
and return an error. arch_console_setup() hides all errors and
returns void. Should it return error code?
int arch_console_setup(void)
{
return acpi_parse_spcr(false, true);
}
Or maybe
void arch_console_setup(void)
{
if (acpi_parse_spcr(false, true))
pr_err(.........);
}
There can be other consoles in the system, logging an error is not
such a useless thing.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists