[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180817142725.GB12426@lerouge>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 16:27:27 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Milind Chabbi <chabbi.milind@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] perf/hw_breakpoint: Modify breakpoint even if the
new attr has disabled set
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 12:47:27PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> We need to change the breakpoint even if the attr with
> new fields has disabled set to true.
>
> Current code prevents following user code to change
> the breakpoint address:
>
> ptrace(PTRACE_POKEUSER, child, offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg[0]), addr_1)
> ptrace(PTRACE_POKEUSER, child, offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg[0]), addr_2)
> ptrace(PTRACE_POKEUSER, child, offsetof(struct user, u_debugreg[7]), dr7)
>
> The first PTRACE_POKEUSER creates the breakpoint with
> attr.disabled set to true:
>
> ptrace_set_breakpoint_addr(nr = 0)
> struct perf_event *bp = t->ptrace_bps[nr];
>
> ptrace_register_breakpoint(..., disabled = true)
> ptrace_fill_bp_fields(..., disabled)
> register_user_hw_breakpoint
>
> So the second PTRACE_POKEUSER will be omitted:
>
> ptrace_set_breakpoint_addr(nr = 0)
> struct perf_event *bp = t->ptrace_bps[nr];
> struct perf_event_attr attr = bp->attr;
>
> modify_user_hw_breakpoint(bp, &attr)
> if (!attr->disabled)
> modify_user_hw_breakpoint_check
>
> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> Reported-by: Milind Chabbi <chabbi.milind@...il.com>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-yjhgplc28gk5gfzt7ceooe6z@git.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Right, now that we fixed the breakpoint modification arch code, it should
be safe to do that.
Thanks!
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists